« Table of Contents PDF (175Kb)
Community Eye Health J 2006;19(57): 6-8
CELL THERAPY
Can we grow new retina?
|
Geeta K VemugantiKeywords: Retinal Degeneration; Cell Therapy; Ethics; Stem Cells
Introduction
Retinal degenerations and dystrophies, the major causes of genetically inherited blindness, are characterised by the death or degeneration of photoreceptors (rods and/or cones).1 Approaches to treating this disease include: a) replacing the defective gene; b) introducing a drug or agent that either slows down or stops the premature death of photoreceptors; c) introducing electronic chips; or d) replacing the damaged cells by cellular therapy. Gene therapy is aimed at counteracting the defective gene by substituting it with the normal gene in the target tissues. Though successful visual recovery has been reported with gene therapy in dog models,2-3 it remains a challenge to identify a safe and reliable way of introducing the corrective gene in humans, given that the genes need to act for the lifetime of the patient. Introduction of ‘a’ factors (such as growth factors) into the eye, directly or through implants, is another novel approach to preventing or slowing premature cell death.4-5 The challenge lies in delivering the drug to the appropriate site in a safe and sustained manner. Electronic chips, similar to the ones used for audio aids, have shown exciting results in some studies, but the technology is still in its infancy.6-7
As knowledge relating to stem cells has increased over the last two decades, attempts have been made to translate this research into clinical practice, particularly for ocular surface reconstruction. Certain ocular surface disorders, like chemical burns, cause damage to the corneal epithelial stem cells. The consequence of this is that the normal corneal epithelium is replaced by conjunctival epithelium, which leads to corneal opacity and vascularisation, with loss of vision. Many centres across the world,8-10 including our centre,11-13 have grown sheets of epithelial cells from stem cells, supported on amniotic membrane. These sheets of cells have then been successfully transplanted to cover the entire corneal surface in individuals with ocular surface disorders, leading to less inflammation and scarring. Though the clinical outcome of this new technique is well established, there are still many unanswered questions, particularly in relation to the long-term survival of the transplanted cells.
LINKS TO PICTURES
What are stem cells?
Stem cells are defined as undifferentiated (‘primitive’) cells that are capable of selfrenewal (dividing) and differentiation (changing into cells which have different structural characteristics and function). There are basically two types of stem cells, embryonic and adult stem cells. The embryonic cells are totipotent and pluripotent, with a potential to generate all the types of cells. The adult stem cells are few in number and are located in different parts of the body, like bone marrow, skin, and intestinal mucosa, and serve the purpose of regenerating that particular tissue/cells of the body throughout the life span. It is now known that some of these adult stem cells, in addition to generating cells of their own lineage, can also generate cells of other lineages by a principle called ‘transdifferentiation’ or ‘plasticity’.14 Bone marrow stromal cells, also called mesenchymal stem cells, are the best example of such cells, as they have the potential to form bone, cartilage, neurons and muscle cells.
What is cell therapy?
Conceptually, cell therapy can be broadly classified into four types:
(a) autologous and homogeneous - i.e. the use of the patient’s own adult stem cells to regenerate cells of the same kind, e.g. skin cells, limbal stem cells;
(b) autologous and non homogeneous - i.e. the use of the patient’s own cells, but to make cells of a different kind, for example regeneration and remodelling of myocardium after injecting autologous bone marrowderived stem cells;
(c) allogenic cell therapy - i.e. the use of cells of the same kind, but from a different donor. This requires the use of immunosuppressive drugs to prevent the rejection of cells, e.g. bone marrow transplantation;
(d) embryonic cell therapy - i.e. the use of embryonic cells that have been characterised, isolated and shown to differentuate along the desired cell type only.
This article presents a conceptual approach to cell therapy and a brief review of progress in this field.
Which cells to choose?
Referring to the above classification of cell therapy, in principle, retina could be grown from: a) stem cells within the retina, retinal stem cells (Figure 1); b) stem cells within the eye, but outside the retina, e.g. ciliary body stem cells or retinal pigment epithelial cells; c) from the patient’s own tissues, but using non-ocular sources, e.g. bone marrow stromal cells or neural stem cells; d) non-self stem cells, e.g. embryonic stem cells. The use of these cells would depend on their availability/accessibility, the techniques available to grow them, the risks involved in harvesting them without the depletion of the donor cells, success in growing them without altering their nature and transplanting them back into the retina.
The progenitor cells of the retina (neural precursor cells)15-16 do have the potential to constitutively replace the different cells of retinal-like neurons, photoreceptors, and glial cells. This approach could be useful in developing and studying the pathobiology of the stem cells in health and disease, but the technical difficulty in obtaining these cells and their limited availability could be an issue. The ciliary and iris pigment progenitor cells contain a mitotically quiescent population of neural progenitors that proliferate to make neural stem cells, with a potential for self-renewal.17-18 Experiments have documented the incorporation of these cells into injured retina, but not normal retina, suggesting that functional integration is possible in damaged tissues. Neural progenitor cells from the brain can restore and survive in the damaged retina,19 but the major limitation is the source of these cells, which is as rare as, or even rarer than, the retinal cells themselves. It has been shown that bone marrow stromal cells can differentiate into retinal cells in injured rat retina, show functional recovery, and also promote or inhibit retinal angiogenesis. 20-23 Similarly, embryonic stem cells (ESCs) were shown to survive, migrate and integrate into the host retina, 24-25 but they do pose a potential risk of tumour-induction after engraftment.
Do we need cells or three dimensional structures?
The question that now arises is: should we deliver the cells into the target site and hope for the damaged tissue to help in the final integration of the transplanted cells, or should we attempt to organise the cells into tissues before transplantation? A 3D tissue architecture not only provides anatomic integration of cells but also improves the functional outcome.26 The cells could also be delivered on polymer substrates to the subretinal space, so as to improve their survival, migration and functional restoration.27
Will the cells integrate?
Now, assuming the cells and the tissues are ready to generate retina, will they integrate into the adult retina? Unlike the clinical application of cultivated epithelial cells for ocular surface reconstruction, the use of neural cells poses tough challenges. More rigid proof of integration of these cells is warranted. Successful cell therapy should fulfill the following criteria: the desired cells should multiply/grow in sufficient quantities, organise into functional units, survive and integrate into the host, and ultimately, function appropriately in a safe manner.
Ethical issues
Clinicians and researchers must constantly deal with the question of adequacy of proof in animal experiments, before moving to human clinical trials. Though a few clinical trials were conducted using foetal cells, there are no published trials using any other cells for clinical transplantation. Reviewing the progress in all fields, it appears that the bone marrow-derived cells have the advantage of being autologous, with proven clinical safety. They could therefore be considered for a pilot study after seeking the approval of regulatory bodies, the Institutional Review Board clearance and patients’ informed consent.
Conclusion
In summary, when permanently damaged, the retinal cells which are specialised neurons, cannot be rescued or repaired in the natural process and therefore warrant cell therapy in future.
References
1 Lolley RN, Rong H, Craft CM. Linkage of photoreceptor degeneration by apoptosis with inherited defect in phototransduction. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994; 35: 358-62.
2 Narfstrom K, Katz ML, Bragadottir R, Seeliger M, Boulanger A, Redmond TM, et al. Functional and structural recovery of the retina after gene therapy in the RPE65 null mutation dog. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003; 44: 1663-72.
3 Le Meur G, Weber M, Pereon Y, Mendes-Madeira A, Nivard D, Deschamps JY, et al. Postsurgical assessment and long-term safety of recombinant adeno-associated virus-mediated gene transfer into the retinas of dogs and primates. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005; 123: 500-6.
4 Chong NH, Alexander RA, Waters L, Barnett KC, Bird AC, Luthert PJ. Repeated injections of a ciliary neurotrophic factor analogue leading to long-term photoreceptor survival in hereditary retinal degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999; 40: 1298-305.
5 Bush RA, Lei B, Tao W, Raz D, Chan CC, Cox TA, et al. Encapsulated cell-based intraocular delivery of ciliary neurotrophic factor in normal rabbit: dose-dependent effects on ERG and retinal histology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004; 45: 2420-30.
6 Margalit E, Maia M, Weiland JD, et al. Retinal prosthesis for the blind. Surv Ophthalmol. 2002; 47: 335–356. 7 Rizzo JF, III, Wyatt J, Loewenstein J, Kelly S, Shire D. Perceptual effi cacy of electrical stimulation of human retina with a microelectrode array during short-term surgical trials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003; 44: 5362–5369.
8 Pellagrini G, Traverso EC, Franzi TA. Long term restoration of damaged corneal surfaces with autologus cultivated corneal epithelium. Lancet1997; 349: 990- 993.
9 Tsai RJ, Li LM, Chen JK. Reconstruction of damaged corneas by transplantation of autologous limbal epithelial cells. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 86-93. 10 Koizumi N, Inatomi T, Suzuki T, Sotozono C, Kinoshita S. Cultivated corneal epithelial stem cell transplantation in ocular surface disorders. Ophthalmology 2001; 108: 1569-74.
11 Sangwan VS, Vemuganti GK, Singh S, Balasubramanian D. Successful reconstruction of damaged ocular outer surface in humans using limbal and conjunctival stem cell culture methods. Biosci Rep. 2003; 23: 169-74.
12 Vemuganti GK, Kashyap S, Sangwan VS, Singh S. Exvivo potential of cadaveric and fresh limbal tissues to regenerate cultured epithelium. Indian J Ophthalmol 2004; 52: 113-20.
13 Sangwan VS, Matalia HP, Vemuganti GK, Ifthekar G, Fatima A, Singh S, Rao GN. Early results of penetrating keratoplasty after cultivated limbal epithelium transplantation. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005r; 123: 334-40.
14 Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, Jaiswal RK, Douglas R, Mosca JD, et al. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science 1999; 284: 143-7.
15 Mayer EJ, Carter DA, Ren Y, Hughes EH, Rice CM, Halfpenny CA, et al. Neural progenitor cells from postmortem adult human retina. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005; 89: 102-6.
16 Coles BL, Angenieux B, Inoue T, Del Rio-Tsonis K, Spence JR, McInnes RR, et al. Facile isolation and the characterization of human retinal stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101: 15772-7.
17 Ahmad I, Tang L, Pham H. Identifi cation of neural progenitors in the adult mammalian eye. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000; 270: 517-21.
18 Haruta M, Kosaka M, Kanegae Y, Saito I, Inoue T, Kageyama R, et al. Induction of photoreceptor-specifi c phenotypes in adult mammalian iris tissue. Nat Neurosci. 2001; 4: 1163-4.
19 Young MJ, Ray J, Whiteley SJ, Klassen H, Gage FH. Neuronal differentiation and morphological integration of hippocampal progenitor cells transplanted to the retina of immature and mature dystrophic rats. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2000; 16: 197-205.
20 Tomita M, Adachi Y, Yamada H, Takahashi K, Kiuchi K, Oyaizu H, et al. Bone marrow-derived stem cells can differentiate into retinal cells in injured rat retina. Stem Cells. 2002; 20: 279-83.
21 Otani A, Kinder K, Ewalt K, Otero FJ, Schimmel P, Friedlander M. Bone marrow-derived stem cells target retinal astrocytes and can promote or inhibit retinal angiogenesis. Nat Med. 2002; 8: 1004-10.
22 Otani A, Dorrell MI, Kinder K, Moreno SK, Nusinowitz S, Banin E, et al. Rescue of retinal degeneration by intravitreally injected adult bone marrow-derived lineage-negative hematopoietic stem cells. J Clin Invest. 2004; 114: 765-74.
23 Kicic A, Shen WY, Wilson AS, Constable IJ, Robertson T, Rakoczy PE. Differentiation of marrow stromal cells into photoreceptors in the rat eye. J Neurosci. 2003; 23: 7742-9.
24 Hara A, Niwa M, Kunisada T, Yoshimura N, Katayama M, Kozawa O, et al. Embryonic stem cells are capable of generating a neuronal network in the adult mouse retina. Brain Res. 2004; 999: 216-21.
25 Meyer JS, Katz ML, Maruniak JA, Kirk MD. Neural differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells in vitro and after transplantation into eyes of mutant mice with rapid retinal degeneration. Brain Res. 2004; 1014: 131-44.
26 Dutt K, Harris-Hooker S, Ellerson D, Layne D, Kumar R, Hunt R. Generation of 3D retina-like structures from a human retinal cell line in a NASA bioreactor. Cell Transplant. 2003; 12: 717-31.
27 Tomita M, Lavik E, Klassen H, Zahir T, Langer R, Young MJ. Biodegradable polymer composite grafts promote the survival and differentiation of retinal progenitor cells. Stem Cells. 2005; 23: 1579-88.