Comm Eye Health Vol. 30 No. 100 2018 pp 90-91. Published online 07 February 2018.

Trachoma then and now: update on mapping and control

Anthony W Solomon

Medical Officer for Trachoma: Department of Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases, World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland.


Paul M Emerson

Director: International Trachoma Initiative, Decatur GA, USA.


Serge Resnikoff

Chair: International Coalition for Trachoma Control; President and Chair: Organisation pour la Prévention de la Cécité, Paris, France.


Related content
Two children washing their faces with water from plastic cups
Facial cleanliness is an important part of the trachoma elimination strategy. MALAWI © Billy Weeks for the Task Force for Global Health

In the last 30 years, there has been rapid progress towards ending the suffering and blindness caused by trachoma, with five countries being validated as having achieved elimination. However, many challenges remain.

When the first issue of the Community Eye Health Journal was being sent to readers around the world in 1988, trachoma was at a turning point. One of the two foundational clinical trials establishing the effectiveness of the bilamellar tarsal rotation procedure for trachomatous trichiasis had just been completed; the other was about to start.1,2 The pharmacokinetics and antimicrobial spectrum of azithromycin, a recently discovered macrolide antibiotic, were in the process of being defined.3,4 The epidemiological association between a lack of facial cleanliness and the presence of active trachoma was becoming clearly established5,6 and the World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) simplified grading system had just been published,7 providing non-specialist health personnel working in endemic communities with a means to clearly and quickly identify and record the burden of disease. Additionally, the first national survey of the prevalence and causes of blindness in a country in Africa had just finished; it was conducted in The Gambia and suggested that 17% of all blindness there was due to trachoma.8

These developments led, in the subsequent decade, to:

  • Demonstration of the effectiveness of single-dose oral azithromycin against active trachoma,9 successful trials of azithromycin mass drug administration,10 and the initiation of a donation scheme by Pfizer, Inc., the manufacturer of azithromycin11
  • Landmark community randomised trials investigating intensive facial cleanliness campaigns and fly control for reducing the prevalence of active disease12,13
  • The 1993 WHO endorsement of the “SAFE strategy” (surgery, antibiotics, facial cleanliness and environmental improvement) for trachoma elimination14
  • Establishment, at the end of 1996, of the WHO Alliance for the Global Elimination of Trachoma by 2020 (GET2020)15
  • The 1998 World Health Assembly resolution 51.11, which called on endemic countries and WHO to take all actions necessary to achieve the GET2020 goal.16

The current landscape

As a consequence of the above, the landscape for trachoma now looks very different.The SAFE strategy is being implemented, partially or at scale, in at least 31 countries. In 2016, the year for which the most recent global data are available, more than 260,000 people had their trachomatous trichiasis managed, while more than 85 million people received antibiotics for trachoma.17 Pfizer’s azithromycin (Zithromax®) donation scheme has ramped up from one hundred thousand doses shipped in 1999, to more than one hundred and twenty million doses shipped in 2016.18 As a result, global antibiotic coverage is expected to increase again from 2016 to 2017.17

Lady handing antibiotics to a female patient
Mass distribution of antibiotics. ETHIOPIA © Robert Essel/ International Trachoma Initiative

Much of these recent increases in output of the SAFE on data from the Global Trachoma Mapping Project (GTMP),19 which from 2012–2016 completed population based prevalence surveys in 1546 districts of 29 countries, adding to the 1,115 districts for which data had previously been amassed.20 By working with health ministries to generate gold-standard data on trachoma prevalence within a culture of collaboration, openness and commitment to quality,21,22 the GTMP helped foster a spirit of genuine collaboration within the trachoma elimination community, shone a light that has helped the rest of the world to see the ongoing public health tragedy of trachoma, and provided the district-by-district justification required to initiate interventions.

Financial resources to complement the continuing azithromycin donation have followed, with new or renewed contributions from a committed group of bilateral agencies, private foundations, non-governmental development organisations, service organisations and individual donors

Concrete proof of progress against disease is now available. The number of people worldwide who need operations for trichiasis is thought to have decreased from 8.2 million in 200723 to 2.8 million in 2016. Similarly, the number of people worldwide living in districts where the A, F and E components of SAFE need to be implemented for trachoma elimination purposes is thought to have decreased from 1,244 million in 2007 to 190 million in 2016.17,23 Oman, Morocco, Mexico, Lao People’s Democratic Republic and Cambodia have now all been officially validated as having eliminated trachoma as a public health problem, while a further six countries (China, Ghana, Iraq, Islamic Republic of Iran, Myanmar and The Gambia) have reported achieving elimination prevalence targets.24

The Community Eye Health Journal has been a part of this journey. In its first 100 issues, it has published more than 50 excellent articles about trachoma (www.cehjournal.org/category/trachoma/), providing a critical forum for education, information, debate and reflection. We congratulate the Journal on its century, and thank the editors, donors and readers who have contributed so much to international efforts against trachoma to date.

It would be wrong, however, to imply through these notes of congratulation that the race against trachoma has now been successfully run, or even that we could coast in from here to the finish line. Significant challenges remain.

  1. There is an urgent need to address the remaining gap between the resources that have been committed and those that will be required.
  2. Important work is also needed on a number of technical issues, including:
  • a. How best to manage post-operative trachomatous trichiasis
  • b. How to most efficiently deliver water, hygiene and sanitation interventions to cut transmission of ocular Chlamydia trachomatis
  • c. How to undertake post-validation surveillance of previously-endemic districts, in order to guard against recrudescence of infection and disease.

It is our hope that with the ongoing political support of endemic country governments, current programmatic momentum, the continuing commitment of our many partners, and the relevance of our work to a multitude of cross-cutting targets within the Sustainable Development Goals,25 the end of trachoma can be achieved.

Four images depicting trichiasis surgery, bottles of antibiotics, a person washing their face and children collecting water from a standpipe
SAFE strategy © International Trachoma Initiative

References

1. The burden of ocular morbidities in Africa, excluding blindness, URE and presbyopia, is now estimated at 8%–10%, based on studies from Kenya, Cameroon, Nigeria and Tanzania

2. VISION 2020: The Right to Sight, WHO/IAPB, 1999

3. World Health Organization. The World Health Report 2006: Working Together for Health, WHO, 2006.

4. Road Map for Scaling up Human Resources for Health: 2012-2025, WHO African Regional Office, 2013

5. Universal Eye Health: A Global Action Plan 2014-2019, WHO, 2013.

6. Strengthening Health Systems for Universal Health Coverage and Sustainable Development, Bulletin of WHO, April 2017.

7. Vision for Africa: Human Resources for Eye Health Strategic Plan: 2014-2023, IAPB Africa, 2014

8. Courtright, Mathenge et al., Setting Targets for Human Resources for Eye Health in sub-Saharan Africa: What Evidence Should be Used? Human Resources for Health, 2016, 14:11

9. Public Financing for Health in Africa: from Abuja to the SDGs, WHO, 2016

10. Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Mariotti SP, Pokharel GP. Global Magnitude of Visual Impairment Caused by Uncorrected Refractive Errors in 2004. Bull. World Health Organisation, 2008;86

11. Situation Analysis of Optometry in Africa, BHVI, AFC, VAO and IAPB, 2016

12. Strategic Framework for the Expansion of Optometry in Africa; 2016-2027, IAPB Africa, 2016.

13. Holden, Fricke et al., Global Vision Impairment due to Uncorrected Presbyopia, Archives of Ophthalmology, Vol. 126, 2008 and Holden, Fricke et al., Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from 2000 through 2050, Ophthalmology, May 2016.

14. WHO Global Health Workforce Alliance http://www.who.int/workforcealliance/en/

15. Palmer, Chinanayi et al., Mapping Human Resources for Eye Health in 21 Countries of sub-Saharan Africa: Current Progress Towards VISION 2020, Human Resources for Health, 2014, 12:44

16. Increasing Access to Health Workers in Remote and Rural Areas Through Improved Retention, Global Policy Recommendations, WHO, 2010

The authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this article and they do not necessarily represent the views, decisions or policies of the institutions with which they are affiliated.

The Trachoma Update series is kindly sponsored by the International Coalition for Trachoma Control www.trachomacoalition.org

“Published with license by the International Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine © 2017 World Health Organization. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.”